This is preaching to the choir probably.

This is preach­ing to the choir probably.

Embed­ded Link

11 Myths About Autism
You’ve prob­a­bly heard lots of thoughts and ideas about autism, but we want to make sure you know what is true and what is false. Our Fam­ily Ser­vices and Sci­ence depart­ment put together 11 myths about autism to help put an end to any mis­con­cep­tions. All of these are great for stu­dents to share with their class­mates. If you’re in col­lege, get involved with Autism Speaks U, a pro­gram that sup­ports col­lege stu­dents in their aware­ness, advo­cacy and fundrais­ing efforts.
1. Myth: Peo­ple with autism …

Google+: View post on Google+

Post imported by Google+Blog. Cre­ated By Daniel Tread­well.

Loading Disqus Comments ...
Loading Facebook Comments ...

15 thoughts on “This is preaching to the choir probably.

  1. November 22, 2011 at 00:39

    The refrig­er­a­tor mom myth is the one that is hard­est to dis­pel, and the one I’ve seen cited by many vet­eran spe­cial edu­ca­tion pro­fes­sional, more than any other myth.

  2. November 22, 2011 at 00:46

    I think the truth they give for 10 is very mis­lead­ing though. It should say that the diag­no­sis of autism has increased not autism. There are a lot of peo­ple now rec­og­nized has hav­ing autism that would never have been diag­nosed in the past.

  3. November 22, 2011 at 00:57

    +Eoghann Irv­ing I’ll con­cede that there is some improve­ment in the tools involved in rec­og­niz­ing and diag­nos­ing Autism. Autism, in any of its man­i­fes­ta­tions, is still diag­nosed poorly and very late, both due to lack of train­ing on the MD side, and poor train­ing on the PhD side. There is still no gen­eral col­lab­o­ra­tion between the dis­ci­plines that, together, should form (for­mal and infor­mal) diag­nos­tic teams and, if prop­erly com­mu­ni­cat­ing, would ensure early diag­no­sis and treat­ment. For exam­ple, many kids get referred by the pedi­a­tri­cian for speech and occu­pa­tional ther­apy ser­vices before the age of three, but sel­dom get referred to a psy­chol­o­gist or devel­op­men­tal pedi­a­tri­cian for fur­ther eval­u­a­tion. Today, we are still see­ing many chil­dren diag­nosed with an Autis­tic dis­or­der in the early teens, who were diag­nosed with ADHD in child­hood. As for the preva­lence issue, I’ve searched my mem­ory banks many times and queried many peo­ple over the years about their expe­ri­ence and I find that, like me, they do not remem­ber ever going to school with kids who are obvi­ously on the Spec­trum as there are now.

  4. November 22, 2011 at 01:08

    Would you even have rec­og­nized them if they were there?

    I almost cer­tainly have Asperg­ers yet was never diag­nosed with any­thing dur­ing my entire time in school.

  5. November 22, 2011 at 01:15

    I have a nineteen-year-old grand­son who I believe is an Asperger. I found the book “Look Me In The Eye; My life with Asperger’s” by John Elder Robi­son to be very enlight­en­ing, as well as a very enter­tain­ing book.

  6. November 22, 2011 at 01:17

    My best friend’s appar­ent ASD did even­tu­ally get described in a “blind men and the ele­phant” kind of way, with an amaz­ing num­ber of NLD, other LD, and sen­sory inte­gra­tion dis­or­der labels in the early ‘90s. I would also sus­pect, from my expe­ri­ence and much of what I’ve heard from other adults, that many were/are just con­sid­ered to be kind of dorky and have prob­lems with “treatment-resistant” anx­i­ety, depres­sion, and the like. That was most cer­tainly the way mine was inter­preted, and it’s not even totally wrong once you throw in years of expe­ri­ence with bul­ly­ing and unad­dressed learn­ing difficulties.

  7. November 22, 2011 at 01:19

    +Eoghann Irv­ing I think I would have rec­og­nized that there was some­thing dif­fer­ent. I know I would not have known that there is a name for it. My hus­band is an Aspie as well. He was diag­nosed with ADHD as a child, and redi­ag­nosed with Asperger’s as an adult, after our daugh­ter was diag­nosed with Autism. Since he was a late talker, I think he prob­a­bly would have been diag­nosed HFA in child­hood, had he seen a bet­ter doc­tor. I am not sur­prised by the fact you weren’t diag­nosed. Not all Aspies need ser­vices or accom­mo­da­tions, and func­tion quite well in spite of their dif­fer­ences. Those are on the high­est end of that spectrum.

    To get back to the kids I saw as a child and later as a teen, I can’t even think of any who met the behav­ior cri­te­ria for ADHD. That too has seen an explo­sion and, for many, merely remov­ing some of the addi­tives in foods (red food dyes in par­tic­u­lar) makes all the difference.

    There is a lot more to this than diag­nos­tic cri­te­ria and method­ol­ogy. It may all come down to genetic pre­dis­po­si­tion and trig­gers of one kind or another, but the ques­tion remains find­ing what pre­cip­i­tated all this.

  8. November 22, 2011 at 01:20

    +Rose Ann Sir­a­cusa That is an excel­lent book. Another great book is Par­al­lel Play by Tim Palmer (fore­word by John Elder Robison)

  9. November 22, 2011 at 01:31

    Con­sid­er­ing the name ADD wasn’t even coined until the 1980 (and ADHD in 87) it’s hardly sur­pris­ing it diag­no­sis is more com­mon now than it used to be.

    I knew kids at school who might well be diag­nosed as ADHD if they were at school today.

    Pre­sent­ing autism as though it is some sort of epi­demic is highly misleading.

  10. November 22, 2011 at 01:48

    +Eoghann Irv­ing 1 in 100 in some places, and 1 in 69 in oth­ers is more than wor­ri­some and maybe a tad less than an epi­demic. Either way, it’s 1 in a 100 or 1 in 69 too many. Then, let’s not for­get that 30% of those diag­nosed with Autism and Asperger’s Syn­drome also have Epilepsy. The mor­tal­ity rate in those with a dual diag­no­sis of Autism and Epilepsy is con­sid­er­ably higher than those with Epilepsy alone.

  11. November 22, 2011 at 02:02

    +Eoghann Irv­ing I used ADHD because he was diag­nosed in the 70s and that’s what they called it back then. :-) Old habits…

  12. November 22, 2011 at 02:05

    Again I dis­agree that it’s 1 in 100 too many. Nei­ther I nor my son need cured. You badly mis­us­ing sta­tis­tics when you present things like that.

    Epilepsy suf­fer­ers have a higher mor­tal­ity rate than those with­out. so the fact it is also the case for those who are also autis­tic is of ques­tion­able relevance.

    Your 30% fig­ure is also at the high­est end of the ranges claimed for epilepsy. It’s usu­ally stated as 10%-30%. 10% is still high, but rad­i­cally dif­fer­ent to 30%

    Bot­tom line… it’s bad sci­ence and bad math.

  13. November 22, 2011 at 02:11

    +Eoghann Irv­ing I guess it all depends on how dis­abled you are. If you’re lucky enough not to be dis­abled in any way and need no help, then your point of view will dif­fer from those whose level of func­tion is affected.

    As for the comor­bid­ity with Epilepsy, I was off by 9%. It’s 39%. You can read about the study here: http://​www​.sci​encedaily​.com/​r​e​l​e​a​s​e​s​/​2​0​1​1​/​0​4​/​1​1​0​4​1​5​0​8​3​1​5​5​.​htm I don’t think it’s bad science.

  14. November 22, 2011 at 02:11

    No they didn’t ADHD is a term that first appeared in 1987. In the 60s and 70s they referred to MBD (Min­i­mal Brain Dysnfunction)

  15. November 22, 2011 at 02:13

    +Eoghann Irv­ing OK. For the sake of pre­ci­sion and cor­rect­ness, I will amend what I wrote to that diag­no­sis that used to describe what is now called ADD hyper­ac­tive type.

Leave a Reply