Apple Sues Samsung… Again

I guess the lawyers over at Apple just didn’t have enough on their plate yet. They’ve filed another law­suit against Sam­sung. This time over 10 smart­phones includ­ing the Galaxy S 2. And yes it’s all over patents.

This must be why Apple needs such a large mar­gin on its prod­ucts. ;)

Embed­ded Link

Apple files law­suit against Sam­sung for patent infringe­ments
Apple has filed yet another law­suit against Sam­sung, this time in Ger­many and con­cern­ing ten smart­phones, includ­ing the Galaxy SII.

Google+: View post on Google+

Post imported by Google+Blog. Cre­ated By Daniel Tread­well.

Loading Disqus Comments ...
Loading Facebook Comments ...

12 thoughts on “Apple Sues Samsung… Again”

  1. Stephan Davied (@Stephan_Davied) (@Stephan_Davied)
    January 17, 2012 at 06:02

    Apple Sues Sam­sung… Again http://t.co/z79CVKli #fan­tasy #fiction

    Reply
  2. Isiaka Oo
    January 17, 2012 at 10:32

    This is just get­ting out of hand.…

    Reply
  3. Stuart Duncan
    January 17, 2012 at 10:34

    The Sam­sung lawyers must laugh every time another one shows up at their door… “another law­suit… I’m SO sur­prised. LOL”

    Reply
  4. Richard McPike
    January 17, 2012 at 10:36

    Apple isn’t the first com­pany Sam­sung has bla­tantly ripped off. A few years ago, before they started mak­ing iPhone knock offs, Samsung’s top of the line prod­uct was a knock off of the Black­Berry called the Black­Jack. Before that it was a Moto RAZR knock off called the A900. Sam­sung has a long his­tory of look­ing at the suc­cess­ful prod­ucts truly cre­ative com­pa­nies are mak­ing and then going and mak­ing cheaper knock offs of them.

    Reply
  5. Eoghann Irving
    January 17, 2012 at 10:38

    That assumes you believe that their phones are a knock­off of the iPhone. Which I don’t.

    We won’t even start on the “truly cre­ative com­pany” non­sense since nei­ther Black­berry or Apple had an orig­i­nal prod­uct to be ripped off.

    Reply
  6. Isiaka Oo
    January 17, 2012 at 10:44

    +Richard McPike the Iphone and the Galaxy S2 do not share any sim­i­lar­i­ties at all.

    Reply
  7. David Gillemo
    January 17, 2012 at 10:44

    Cheaper knock offs??

    Reply
  8. Katey Springle Lempka
    January 17, 2012 at 11:06

    I’ve said it before… if Apple is so con­cerned about com­pe­ti­tion, maybe they should con­sider bring­ing their prices down out of the stratosphere.

    Reply
  9. Richard McPike
    January 17, 2012 at 11:11

    The iPhone 3GS is $0 on AT&T. The iPhone 4 is $99 on both AT&T, Ver­i­zon and Sprint. Yes, that’s with con­tracts, but that’s the way vir­tu­ally all con­sumers pur­chase phones in the United States. How much cheaper than $0 should Apple go?

    Reply
  10. Julia Piatt
    January 17, 2012 at 11:28

    +Richard McPike Apple loses noth­ing in the deal. Your phone isn’t really free. Your pay for dur­ing your con­tract period. That’s how it works.

    Reply
  11. Richard McPike
    January 17, 2012 at 11:55

    Did I ever say my phone was free? My phone cost $199 up front. How much of my month to month bill goes to Apple? I don’t know, and I don’t care. My smart­phone plan costs the same as every­one else’s smart­phone plans on AT&T. If Apple is get­ting some of the rev­enue from my con­tract, and AT&T is keep­ing all of the rev­enue from the con­tracts of folks using non-Apple phones, what does that mat­ter to me?

    Reply
  12. Julia Piatt
    January 17, 2012 at 14:29

    >head­desk<

    Reply

Leave a Reply