What Does Marijuana Do To Your Brain?

The world doesn’t really need another dis­cus­sion on whether mar­i­juana should be legal­ized or not, but I think it is inter­est­ing to see exactly what effects the drug has on your brain.

Tags #Thi­sIsY­our­BrainOn

Embed­ded Link

Mar­i­juana and your Brain [info­graphic] | Daily Info­graphic
Mar­i­juana. Legal­ize it or not? That’s the ques­tion many states are debat­ing; whether to legal­ize the recre­ational or med­ical use of Mary Jane. The argu­ments that mar­i­juana is an addic­tive sub­stance an…

Google+: Reshared 1 times
Google+: View post on Google+

Post imported by Google+Blog. Cre­ated By Daniel Tread­well.

Loading Disqus Comments ...
Loading Facebook Comments ...

14 thoughts on “What Does Marijuana Do To Your Brain?

  1. March 13, 2012 at 10:34

    The sci­ence is inter­est­ing, but the author doesn’t really seem to have a han­dle on the rea­sons for/against legal­iza­tion. And maybe it was his inten­tion to ignore that par­tic­u­lar debate in the inter­est of just offer­ing some information.

  2. March 13, 2012 at 10:36

    I think it was +Katey Springle Lempka. Or per­haps like me he just thinks the sub­ject has been cov­ered and all any­one is doing is preach­ing to their par­tic­u­lar choir.

  3. March 13, 2012 at 10:37

    “all any­one is doing is preach­ing to their par­tic­u­lar choir.”

    Sadly, this could be said of just about every topic in Amer­i­can pol­i­tics today.

  4. March 13, 2012 at 10:38

    Most of them yes +Katey Springle Lempka. There are cer­tain debates that I am very bored with. Reli­gion and drug laws are the top of that list. No one has actu­ally said any­thing new on the sub­ject in a very long time.

  5. March 13, 2012 at 10:56

    I don’t believe this fully encom­passes the truth of the affects on the brain with mar­i­juana use (hav­ing seen vary­ing affects that are not even men­tioned here) . And it def­i­nitely doesn’t address the affects that these changes in the brain have on every­thing else in life.

    Per­son­ally, at this point I don’t care. Peo­ple are going to do it either way. I have my stance, and I will make my own choices :)

    Of course… my think­ing comes from the rad­i­cal Chris­t­ian view that we are allowed to make our own choices in life…

    (sorry +Eoghann Irv­ing I had to add reli­gion just because you men­tioned you are bored of it! lol I’m just hav­ing fun)

  6. March 13, 2012 at 11:19

    Hon­estly, all of this is a bunch of hooey… I may get back­lash on this, but lets be hon­est with our­selves. The only neg­a­tive thing you can see in that chart is the mem­ory issue (which I’m pretty sure I recently saw they debunked the long term effects on mem­ory, but I’d need to find that study in order to say that with con­fi­dence). Either way, 1 neg­a­tive vs TONS of pos­i­tives (mar­i­juana can relieve over 200 symp­toms of seri­ous ill­nesses, a few of these symp­toms being listed in the chart).

    Imag­ine putting up the same chart for almost ANY pre­scrip­tion drug. The ben­e­fits to your sys­tem would be far less than the neg­a­tives. Includ­ing that you could die. Now imag­ine that same chart for alco­hol. Again… death being an option. Sud­denly, our mar­i­juana chart would look promising.

    Of course a chart that says it will affect your mem­ory looks bad, but that chart also doesn’t men­tion your alter­na­tives that could pos­si­bly kill you. Think about it. You form an ill­ness that is extremely painful. What would you pre­fer? A drug that can relieve over 200 of your symp­toms with only 1 minor (and not yet solid) side effect OR a legal pre­scrip­tion that may pro­vide only minor relief but cause far more prob­lems includ­ing pos­si­ble death. hmmm.….

    There is NOTHING neg­a­tive about mar­i­juana use for many peo­ple suf­fer­ing. The only prob­lem there has ever been with mar­i­juana is pos­si­bly the peo­ple using it. Yes, there are pot­heads that sit around and do noth­ing but smoke pot. We all know the stereo­type. But let me assure you that this is the per­sons fault, not the pot. With or with­out the pot they would be lazy. Why do i say this? Because for every one of them, there are a cou­ple more “pot­heads” who no one even knows exist. The kind that use it for med­i­c­i­nal rea­sons, or even for recre­ation. But ONLY after they’ve han­dled their respon­si­bil­i­ties. They are pro­duc­tive mem­bers of soci­ety and there’s noth­ing wrong with their use of pot.

    This chart needs to bet­ter depict these side effects. Given alone some might look bad. Given with your alter­na­tives, this looks amazing!

  7. March 13, 2012 at 11:23

    The chart is sim­ply an illus­tra­tion of what mar­i­juana does. It’s not pro or anti. That’s what I liked about it.

  8. March 13, 2012 at 11:25

    I get that. But such things are fuel for the anti side and are mis­lead­ing. It dis­plays facts with­out putting them into per­spec­tive. Which is fine. But again… Look­ing at the facts may make you look at this and say “oh no! mem­ory loss. can’t fight the facts. pot is bad!”… but it would never occur to you that some­one using mar­i­juana may have no other alter­na­tives but very harsh and risky pre­scrip­tions. Like i said it’s the dif­fer­ence between “oh no” and “yay”

  9. March 13, 2012 at 11:33

    I can’t imag­ine any­one anti-legalization using this chart. It makes it very clear (as does the accom­pa­ny­ing text).

    What you are ask­ing for is for them to bias the chart to favor of the side you are on.

  10. March 13, 2012 at 11:35

    Side effects can be any­where from prob­a­ble to mildly pos­si­ble. So, to dis­count the neg­a­tives as hooey is not always the best way to view it. It can be a gate­way drug for the indi­vid­ual who has a highly addic­tive per­son­al­ity. All drugs have their pos­i­tives and neg­a­tives, and the indi­vid­ual should always weigh the ben­e­fits with the risks.

  11. March 13, 2012 at 11:37

    there was not only 1 neg­a­tive affect. How you word things makes a dif­fer­ence as well. My hus­band and I have had fun with word­ing to prove a point, that you can make any­thing sound good with the proper tone, or usage of words as well.

    I won’t get into the spe­cific debate. Again, I don’t care. I know too many peo­ple that screw up a LOT while doing mar­i­juana. But again, that is their choice, and I can­not make it for them, even if it is destroy­ing their family.

    Now, that is also for a recre­ational use view, not a med­i­c­i­nal view.

  12. March 13, 2012 at 11:38

    sorry for lack of edit­ing– about to go into a meet­ing. bbs

  13. March 13, 2012 at 12:03

    +Eoghann Irv­ing that is absurd. I’m not ask­ing them to “bias” the chart. I’m ask­ing them to show the whole pic­ture. Again, just stat­ing the facts can often be mis­lead­ing. Given the word­ing every­thing is reduced, altered, impaired. Even when speak­ing pos­i­tively, they always use a neg­a­tive word. Add that to the fact that BY ITSELF, these facts show that mar­i­juana DOES affect the brain. That alone is enough for some to see this as a warn­ing. Whereas com­par­isons would have shown a bet­ter pic­ture. Addi­tional details mat­ter. And yes, I take issue with a learn­ing tool that can be used to manip­u­late. It’s just the kind of thing politi­cians LOVE. Mis­lead­ing charts, facts, and fig­ures… They are the holy grail because they ARE fact.

    If I told you that I killed 5 peo­ple it would look pretty bad right? If you then found out that I killed 5 peo­ple who were in the process of bru­tally beat­ing my child, you might see it dif­fer­ent. The details matter.

    PS — Don’t think for a sec­ond that the lit­tle added part at the bot­tom is help­ful. 9% of peo­ple sur­veyed used mar­i­juana once and became depen­dent? That is a mis­lead­ing and pos­si­bly false num­ber. I’d have to look into it, but that num­ber must be based on per­sonal account. It’s my under­stand­ing that the only pos­si­ble depen­dence is of a men­tal nature and would take far more than 1 use to cre­ate a depen­dence. Add that to the fact that the typ­i­cal mar­i­juana user doesn’t even expe­ri­ence effects the first time, and I ques­tion this 100%. The chart may be neu­tral, but to me it does more harm than good.

Leave a Reply