Why We Couldn’t Have Faked Going To The Moon

What sad­dens me is not the excel­lent job he did show­ing the flaws in the con­spir­acy logic, but that he needed to. 

I don’t really under­stand why peo­ple need to believe in con­spir­a­cies so badly.

Google+: Reshared 9 times
Google+: View post on Google+

Loading Disqus Comments ...
Loading Facebook Comments ...

13 thoughts on “Why We Couldn’t Have Faked Going To The Moon

  1. January 26, 2013 at 19:58

    I posted this video last week. :-D It is fan­tas­tic, and deserves re-posting!

  2. January 26, 2013 at 20:11

    that was glorious.

  3. January 26, 2013 at 20:18

    Fas­ci­nat­ing.

  4. January 26, 2013 at 20:23

    Great! Thanks! Really enjoyed it.

  5. January 26, 2013 at 20:27

    Peo­ple believe in con­spir­a­cies because they don’t want us to.

    (sorry — couldn’t resist)

  6. January 26, 2013 at 20:28

    Excel­lent. Now that’s got me think­ing all over again. Damn. But thanks. Nice production.

  7. January 26, 2013 at 20:37

    That was totally classy!!

  8. January 26, 2013 at 21:34

    Con­spir­acy the­o­ries are like reli­gion in that some peo­ple can­not process that some things occur ran­domly or with­out some kind of grand plan. The death of JFK was mon­u­men­tal in its impact, they rea­son, so how could that have been car­ried out by a sin­gle guy work­ing by him­self? Going to the moon was a huge deal, too, and they can’t con­ceive that it was basi­cally thanks to a fairly small hand­ful of sci­en­tists and engi­neers. All con­spir­acy the­o­ries basi­cally boil down to peo­ple work­ing from a rel­a­tively myopic view­point — “If I couldn’t make all the nec­es­sary cal­cu­la­tions to send a man to the moon, how could any­one else?” “If I can’t con­ceive of a ratio­nale for how and why one man would want to kill the pres­i­dent, then it must have been the work of sev­eral peo­ple!” They prob­a­bly don’t think some­thing like that at a con­scious level, but that’s the basic rationale.

  9. January 26, 2013 at 21:53

    To some peo­ple, Con­spir­acy The­o­ries give more mean­ing to mun­dane events involv­ing celebri­ties of one stripe or another, or just oth­er­wise mun­dane tragedies. Lee Har­vey Oswald couldn’t have shot JFK on his own -> The CIA put him up to it! Princess Diana couldn’t have been killed in a ‘mere’ tragic car acci­dent. There was a British Gov­ern­ment Con­spir­acy to pre­vent Dodi Al-Fayed from becom­ing part of the British Royal Fam­ily! And so on and so forth. :/

  10. January 27, 2013 at 04:00

    Some con­spir­acy the­o­ries, unfor­tu­nately, can become all too real.  While the Moon land­ings can be faked for a tele­vi­sion audi­ence, a fake pro­gram can’t repli­cate the actual evi­dence that can be seen today.  There are, how­ever, more seri­ous ques­tions sur­round­ing the gov­ern­ments of the world, none the least of which sur­round the admin­is­tra­tion of the cur­rent Amer­i­can gov­ern­ment.  I thought the Water­gate scan­dal was bad, but this is much worse.  The Nixon admin­is­tra­tion and Water­gate was just a con­spir­acy the­ory too, until it was blown open.  Now we have Benghazi-gate, Fast and Furi­ous, finan­cial Bailouts for friends of the admin­is­tra­tion, cen­tral bank mon­e­tary pol­icy, the LIBOR scan­dal, and on and on.

  11. January 27, 2013 at 05:26

    some­one should come up w/ hilar­i­ous con­spir­acy the­o­ries… sim­ply to make peo­ple see how easy it is to cre­ate one.

  12. January 27, 2013 at 07:43

    Tech­ni­cally those would meet the def­i­n­i­tion of con­spir­acy, but they are not what peo­ple mean when they talk about con­spir­acy theories.

    For a start, with­out excep­tion they do come to the public’s atten­tion and their valid­ity is tested. This com­pletely fails the def­i­n­i­tion of con­spir­acy theory.

    Except pos­si­bly “cen­tral bank mon­e­tary policy”

  13. January 27, 2013 at 07:51

    Where were you back in 69, smoke’n dope an drink’n wine…  Just an outlaw!

    I was just 9 in 69, but we were all sit­ting in front of the floor model black and white, watch­ing Neil Arm­strong steep on the moon!

Leave a Reply