The History of Science Fiction Part 8: John W. Campbell

There are a lot of very col­or­ful char­ac­ters from the early days of sci­ence fic­tion. But a hand­ful of them were so influ­en­tial that they influ­enced the direc­tion of the whole genre. John W. Camp­bell undoubt­edly falls into this cat­e­gory. In fact so sig­nif­i­cant was his con­tri­bu­tion that the Golden Age of sci­ence fic­tion is gen­er­ally marked as start­ing from the time he took edi­tor­ship of Astound­ing Sci­ence Fiction.

Born in Newark, New Jer­sey in 1910, Camp­bell attended MIT but was later dis­missed from the school. He began writ­ing sci­ence fic­tion when he was 18 and was a suc­cess­ful pulp writer by the time he was 21.

Campbell’s first pub­lish­ing suc­cess was a story called When Atoms Failed which appeared in the Jan­u­ary 1930 issue of Amaz­ing Sto­ries.  Between 1930 and 1938 he pub­lished twenty one short sto­ries. He built his name ini­tially around pulp space opera fiction.

How­ever a num­ber of styl­is­ti­cally dif­fer­ent sto­ries were pub­lished under the pen name of Don A. Stu­art. One of those is per­haps the best known and most influ­en­tial of his own fic­tion Who Goes There which has been adapted for film three times. First as The Thing from Another World in 1951. Then again as The Thing in 1982 and most recently as The Thing in 2011.

After becom­ing edi­tor of Astound­ing Sto­ries Camp­bell moved away from writ­ing him­self and started to con­cen­trate solely on edit­ing. His short sto­ries were col­lected and released in a vari­ety of forms over the sub­se­quent decades.

Astound­ing Sci­ence Fiction

Camp­bell was appointed edi­tor of Astound­ing Sto­ries in 1937 but didn’t take full con­trol until 1938. From the moment he took over, he started mak­ing changes in an effort to pro­mote the sort of sto­ries he wanted to see.

He insti­tuted reg­u­lar non-fiction pieces with the idea of stim­u­lat­ing new sto­ries ideas. The style of the cover art­work changed too, with a more mature look that he hoped would be less embar­rass­ing for adult read­ers. It was dur­ing this period that the title of the mag­a­zine was changed from Astound­ing Sto­ries to Astound­ing Science-Fiction

Those early issues also pro­vided some remark­able finds includ­ing Lester del Rey, A E van Vogt, Robert A Hein­lein, Isaac Asi­mov and Theodore Stur­geon. Estab­lished writ­ers also appeared includ­ing L. Ron Hub­bard, Clif­ford Simak, E E Smith and L. Sprague de Camp.

Dur­ing this time Camp­bell also started Unknown  (later to be called Unknown Worlds) which was intended as a fan­tasy com­pan­ion to Astound­ing. Unfor­tu­nately, war time paper short­ages resulted in can­cel­la­tion after only four years.

What set Camp­bell apart from his pre­de­ces­sors was his insis­tence that his writ­ers use sci­ence to under­pin their sto­ries. The most famous exam­ple of this was the story Dead­line by Cleve Cart­mil which appeared in a 1944 issue. The story used accu­rate sci­en­tific infor­ma­tion to describe how to build an atomic bomb (this was a full year before the first det­o­na­tion). The pub­li­ca­tion resulted in a visit from the FBI.

After the war a com­bi­na­tion of per­son­al­ity con­flicts and increased com­pe­ti­tion from other magazines.marked the end of Astounding’s over­whelm­ing dom­i­nance of the genre. It didn’t help that Camp­bell became increas­ingly inter­ested in psue­do­science like psion­ics and heav­ily pro­moted dia­net­ics (which would become sci­en­tol­ogy). A world view that was very much con­trary to his ear­lier sci­ence heavy approach.

For all that many his­tor­i­cally sig­nif­i­cant sto­ries and arti­cles con­tin­ued to appear in Astounding’s pages.

To fur­ther empha­sise the seri­ous sci­en­tific nature of the mag­a­zine, in 1960 the name was changed to Ana­log Sci­ence Fic­tion and Fact. Camp­bell con­tin­ued to edit the mag­a­zine right up to his death in 1971.

Con­tro­ver­sial Opinions

Camp­bell had a rep­u­ta­tion for writ­ing con­tro­ver­sial edi­to­ri­als on a num­ber of top­ics. It’s not clear if he nec­es­sar­ily believed all of those posi­tions he took. Author Fred­er­ick Pohl recalled that every month Camp­bell would come up with a polem­i­cal state­ment and present it to every­one who came in the offices and encour­age them to dis­agree with it. By the end of the month he was in a posi­tion to counter all of the argu­ments in his editorial.

Some of his more con­tro­ver­sial pieces included an argu­ment that black slaves were bet­ter off than they had been in Africa and it would have been bet­ter if the civil war had not been fought over slav­ery since increas­ing mech­a­ni­sa­tion would soon have under­cut the prac­tice anyway.

He was also fero­ciously dis­mis­sive of anti-tobacco cam­paigns and insisted there was no demon­stra­ble cor­re­la­tion between tobacco and cancer.

Dia­net­ics & Pseudo Science

Campbell’s inter­est in a vari­ety of pseudo sci­ence increased from the 1950s onwards and he pub­lished more sto­ries about things like psion­ics. This empha­sis on what could be gen­er­ously described as fringe sci­ence was off putting to many of the authors that had pre­vi­ously con­tributed to Astound­ing. By the time of his death many were no longer sub­mit­ting to the mag­a­zine, includ­ing major authors like Isaac Asimov.

The dubi­ous sci­ence that got the most atten­tion from Camp­bell though was Dia­net­ics, invented by L. Ron Hub­bard (a fig­ure for another arti­cle). The orig­i­nal arti­cle by Hub­bard was pub­lished in Astound­ing and described by Camp­bell as one of the most impor­tant arti­cles ever published.

In the early pre-Scientology days, Camp­bell was con­sid­ered one of the top three fig­ures within the Dia­net­ics group although this grad­u­ally changed partly due to Hub­bards increased inter­est in con­cepts like rein­car­na­tion and also a reluc­tance to accept input from oth­ers and by 1952 he with­drew from the group.

Talk­a­tive, opin­ion­ated, quicksilver-minded, over­bear­ing. Talk­ing to him meant lis­ten­ing to a monologue

That was one of Isaac Asimov’s descrip­tions of Camp­bell. And it’s more com­pli­men­tary than what many had to say of him. Like many pio­neers of SF he was a con­tro­ver­sial fig­ure with a sub­stan­tial ego and major char­ac­ter quirks. Dur­ing the 60s even Hein­lein (a good friend of Camp­bells) was com­plain­ing about hav­ing his sto­ries rejected. Per­haps that is what it took to suc­ceed in those days. Since he is in good company.

But if his later decline is sad, we shouldn’t let that over­shadow the effect he had on the entire genre dur­ing the 30s and 40s. The list of authors he pro­moted is excep­tional and the style of sci­ence fic­tion he encour­aged are a last­ing legacy. Not to men­tion the phe­nom­e­nal list of fic­tion that Camp­bell was respon­si­ble for edit­ing over the years.

Sug­gested Reading

Fic­tion
Who Goes There? — ( http://​amzn​.to/​T​m​9​5lD )
The John W. Camp­bell Anthol­ogy — ( http://​amzn​.to/​1​1​p​6​Txm )

Auto­bi­og­ra­phy
The John W. Camp­bell Let­ters Vol I — ( http://​amzn​.to/​U​9​3​EIm )
The John W. Camp­bell Let­ters Vol II — ( http://​amzn​.to/​X​t​n​QRq )

Index: https://​plus​.google​.com/​u​/​0​/​1​1​7​6​6​8​3​9​2​7​5​0​5​7​9​2​9​2​6​0​9​/​p​o​s​t​s​/​4​L​H​u​o​y​t​7​31B
Tag: #The­His­to­ry­Of­ScienceFic­tion

Google+: Reshared 2 times
Google+: View post on Google+

Loading Disqus Comments ...
Loading Facebook Comments ...

2 thoughts on “The History of Science Fiction Part 8: John W. Campbell

  1. February 1, 2013 at 14:00

    Thanks for high­light­ing this Mr. Camp­bell! Def­i­nitely influ­en­tial in the SF world.

  2. February 1, 2013 at 14:40

    Shared to Sci Fi Community.

Leave a Reply